On 28 January 2014 14:14, evilrat <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 28 January 2014 at 13:59:48 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> On 28 January 2014 13:24, evilrat <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Tuesday, 28 January 2014 at 10:03:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2014-01-28 04:00, Sarath Kodali wrote: >>>> >>>>> Next month I will be releasing an alpha version with support for Linux, >>>>> x86, Elf+Dwarf, DMD and GCC. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm waiting for the OS X version :) >>> >>> >>> >>> not going happen until dmd gets fixed. i'm not tested GDC yet, but others >>> compilers don't emit variable address info for debug or it shown as >>> "optimized out" values. i think it may be related to TLS because >>> __gshared >>> variables CAN be debugged. >> >> >> 1) If it's "optimised out" then I suggest not running a debugger with >> -O generated code. > > > it is optimized out with LDC compiled program, and simply not present with > DMD. >
This sounds promising for GDC (I'm yet to come across some that is along the lines of what you describe).
