On Sunday, 29 November 2015 at 11:58:20 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
I've never said the GC is compatible with real-time, it isn't. I said, we can avoid it in a small part of an application and be real-time. So D can do real-time (audio).

Yes, but why say it if you don't use it after init?

It's not new that D, like C++, can work like a more powerful version of C. Although I had to create a lot of fuzz to even get to this point where we now have at least the @nogc tag. A couple of years ago neither Walter or Andrei showed any sign of understanding that being GC reliant was an issue for a system level programming language. That attitude is pretty common for languages that ship with a GC, and is the reason for why people don't want audio software using it (or is boasting it).

Reply via email to