14.06.2016 13:04, ketmar пишет:
I don't agree if you don't mind. I have two almost identical
implementation of the same thing in D and C++. And if I rebuild them
totally - yes, dmd is faster than gcc:
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 07:45:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I couldn't agree more. With the D compiler being so fast it's
reasonable to just recompile everything at once instead of trying to
track what's changed.
i'm agree with that. i'm so used to do just "rdmd main.d" in my projects
(ranged from "hello, world" to complex game engines).
dmd 5 secs
ldmd2 6 secs
make 40 secs
make -j10 11 secs
But if I changed several lines only then dmd time doesn't change and gcc
takes much less time. In fact digits are small for D, but I feel the
difference really. Not big, not bad, but it exists.