On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 08:04:19 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 13/12/2017 7:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 06:53:02 rikki cattermole via
> > Digitalmars-d->
> > announce wrote:
> >> On 13/12/2017 6:46 AM, bauss wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 01:14:26 UTC, Seb wrote:
> >>>> On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 00:32:11 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:
> >>>>> On 12/12/2017 6:37 PM, Seb wrote:
> >>>>>> === Supported D Compilers ===
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Latest DMD nightly
> >>>>>> * Latest DMD beta
> >>>>>> * Latest DMD
> >>>>>> * Latest LDC beta
> >>>>>> * Latest LDC
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Docker images are rebuilt every day automatically.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can we please select a version we want to test against?
> >>>>
> >>>> While it would be rather easier to build more Docker images [1] and
> >>>> add them to the tour [2], I fear that this will be too much
> >>>> maintenance overhead and will lead to outdated compiler soon.
> >>>> Also the storage on the machine is limited and we can't drop an
> >>>> unlimited amount of Docker images there.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://github.com/dlang-tour/core-exec
> >>>> [2]
> >>>> https://github.com/dlang-tour/core/blob/master/source/exec/docker.d#L
> >>>> 22
> >>>
> >>> What you could do is support the 3 latest versions of the compilers.
> >>>
> >>> Ex. for DMD you would support:
> >>> 2.077.1
> >>> 2.076.1
> >>> 2.075.1
> >>
> >> Also the older c++ version (2.06x.x).
> >
> > What would be the point of that? That's old enough that no one should
> > really be using it. Targetting it just runs the risk of your code not
> > working with a recent version of the compiler and standard library.
> >
> > - Jonathan M Davis
>
> One word, dmd.

What about it?

- Jonathan M Davis

Reply via email to