On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 08:04:19 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d- announce wrote: > On 13/12/2017 7:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 06:53:02 rikki cattermole via > > Digitalmars-d-> > > announce wrote: > >> On 13/12/2017 6:46 AM, bauss wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 01:14:26 UTC, Seb wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 00:32:11 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: > >>>>> On 12/12/2017 6:37 PM, Seb wrote: > >>>>>> === Supported D Compilers === > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * Latest DMD nightly > >>>>>> * Latest DMD beta > >>>>>> * Latest DMD > >>>>>> * Latest LDC beta > >>>>>> * Latest LDC > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Docker images are rebuilt every day automatically. > >>>>> > >>>>> Can we please select a version we want to test against? > >>>> > >>>> While it would be rather easier to build more Docker images [1] and > >>>> add them to the tour [2], I fear that this will be too much > >>>> maintenance overhead and will lead to outdated compiler soon. > >>>> Also the storage on the machine is limited and we can't drop an > >>>> unlimited amount of Docker images there. > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://github.com/dlang-tour/core-exec > >>>> [2] > >>>> https://github.com/dlang-tour/core/blob/master/source/exec/docker.d#L > >>>> 22 > >>> > >>> What you could do is support the 3 latest versions of the compilers. > >>> > >>> Ex. for DMD you would support: > >>> 2.077.1 > >>> 2.076.1 > >>> 2.075.1 > >> > >> Also the older c++ version (2.06x.x). > > > > What would be the point of that? That's old enough that no one should > > really be using it. Targetting it just runs the risk of your code not > > working with a recent version of the compiler and standard library. > > > > - Jonathan M Davis > > One word, dmd.
What about it? - Jonathan M Davis
