On 02/09/2018 07:11 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 11:16:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)
wrote:
On 02/09/2018 05:31 AM, Kagamin wrote:
version(none)q{ FOO }; is likely to work for most stuff too.
/+ +/ is likely to work for most stuff, too.
So do /* */
Seriously, are you trying to troll? (Not rhetorical, genuinely wondering.)
No. No, /* */ isn't likely to work with most stuff. Not in any codebase
that actually USES /* */. Not without it being granted nestability. And
no, I'm not talking theoretically or speculating here, this is speaking
from years of direct experience on codebases that use /* */.
