On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 04:16:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 02/09/2018 07:11 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 11:16:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 02/09/2018 05:31 AM, Kagamin wrote:
version(none)q{ FOO }; is likely to work for most stuff too.

/+ +/ is likely to work for most stuff, too.

So do /* */

Seriously, are you trying to troll? (Not rhetorical, genuinely wondering.)

No. No, /* */ isn't likely to work with most stuff. Not in any codebase that actually USES /* */. Not without it being granted nestability. And no, I'm not talking theoretically or speculating here, this is speaking from years of direct experience on codebases that use /* */.

here's the canonical example where `/* */` fails:

Try to comment that with `/* */`:
```
void drawCircle(int angle /* in degrees */);
```

Reply via email to