On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
> So, as usual, its one set of rules for the world, and another set for
> Joe Baptista.
>
> Just so we know your position on the issues, Joe. It's all clear now.
William, you may not of had a first class education - but you are capable
of doing better here. Your not an idiot, however hard you may try, you
are not an idiot - and I find it offensive when you pretend to be
one. Those feelings are shared by others here and elsewhere.
Now - one more time. Sending unsolicited email to people who you depend
on for an income is a significantly different issue from sending
unsolicited email to people who you have no dependence on. In the first
we have the potential for financial disaster and in the second case only
one's reputation is on the line - not one's bank book ;-)
regards
your favourite pussy cat
joe
--
Joe Baptista
http://www.dot.god/
dot.GOD Hostmaster
- Re: ICANN End user survey Philippe Landau
- Re: ICANN End user survey Scott Allan
- Re: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re[2]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: ICANN End user survey Swerve
- Re[4]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN End user survey Joe Baptista
- Re[6]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN End user survey !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re[8]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[8]: ICANN End user survey !Dr. Joe Baptista
- RE: Re[8]: ICANN End user survey Dassa
- RE: Re[8]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re: Re[8]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re: Re[8]: ICANN End user survey Fagyal Csongor
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN End user survey Robert Kidd
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN End user survey !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN End user survey Swerve
- Re[6]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN End user survey Swerve
- Re[8]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
