Well, William.
You keep stating that Adam's position is extreme, when you misquote him
or not. Why not explain why you think his position is extreme?
With upwards of a billion (1,000,000,000) people going online in the next
few years, i find maximum comfort in people moving towards opt in scenarios.
I am seriously concerned about the possibility of having 10,000 unsolicited
mail pieces in my in box every day.
Swerve
> From: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: WXWeb Services
> Reply-To: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 12:02:09 -0800
> To: Swerve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: opensrs discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re[6]: ICANN End user survey
>
> Tuesday, November 07, 2000, 12:00:28 PM, you wrote:
>
>> William,
>
> You wrote >> > "Adam has previously and in this email indicated that the
>> doesn't think that ANY contact without prior permission for any purpose by
>> anyone is appropriate, whether by email, mail, or phone."
>
>> Please read Adam's threads more carefully. You'll see below he states
>> "except in extraordinary circumstances".
>
>>>>> I don't believe anyone
>>>>> should be contacted in any way without their prior permission, except in
>>>>> extraordinary circumstances.
>
>> Again, i don't find this an extreme position. His position reflects a
>> growing opt. in. philosophy that many people/companies are adopting. Thus,
>> the default being, no mail unless you specifically opt in for it. In
>> emergencies, or extraordinary circumstances, mail becomes acceptable.
>
> That's extreme.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
