Hello Swerve,
Tuesday, November 07, 2000, 1:46:19 PM, you wrote:
> Well, William.
> You keep stating that Adam's position is extreme, when you misquote him
> or not. Why not explain why you think his position is extreme?
> With upwards of a billion (1,000,000,000) people going online in the next
> few years, i find maximum comfort in people moving towards opt in scenarios.
> I am seriously concerned about the possibility of having 10,000 unsolicited
> mail pieces in my in box every day.
I here that argument from people who want all communications
(telephone, mail, email, etc) to require opt-in, but the fact is that
the numbers never seem to be accurate.
We have had telephone solicitation, bulk email, etc for ages, and
there is nothing to indicate that the scenario you present would ever
occur.
People who take this 100% opt-in position, tend to blow the issues out
of proportion.
It's an extreme position.
I did not do an exact quote of Adam, but I did properly describe his
position.
--
Best regards,
William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
