"William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I have, on many other forums, debunked the school of thought regarding > spam being a cost shifting argument. It is really offtopic here, but > if you would like to email me offlist, I will gladly provide you URLs > to archive threads where this issue has been discussed, and where the > numbers clearly show that the cost shifting argument is a strawman. > Now you're just talking nonsense William. Good day to you sir. adam
- Re: Re[8]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re: Re[8]: ICANN End user survey Fagyal Csongor
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN End user survey Robert Kidd
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN End user survey !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN End user survey Swerve
- Re[6]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN End user survey Swerve
- Re[8]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[8]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re[10]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN End user survey WebWiz
- Re[6]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re: Re[2]: ICANN End user survey adam
- Re[4]: ICANN End user survey William X. Walsh
- Dispute resolution policy question Toxik - Fabian Rodriguez
- Re: Dispute resolution policy question Marc Schneiders
