Yes, but if you read back through the context of this thread, it was
suggested that perhaps it would be possible for The Registry to allow a
refund in the case of a chargeback.
It's really doubtful that it will ever happen, but it's still a option.
I'm still curious as to OpenSRS's position on refunding their profit ($4) to
the RSP when a chargeback occurs. The RSP is still shafted for the $6 that
The Registry takes, but this could help even it out. $4 isn't a lot, but
since we lose the domain, then perhaps it's fair to share the lost, rather
then forcing the RSP to absorb the entire cost?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "William X. Walsh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Discuss OpenSRS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 5:58 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's
> The Registry is built to only allow a 5 day grace period for deleting
> domains. Anything outside of that is a charged transaction to the
> Registrar...
>
> --
>
> Charles Daminato
> Tucows Product Manager (ccTLDs)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Warren
> > Sent: December 11, 2000 3:56 AM
> > To: William X. Walsh; Discuss OpenSRS
> > Subject: Re: Re[2]: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's
> >
> >
> >
> > > I don't support the goal of the effort. It throws out of balance the
> > > wise decision OpenSRS made to balance the rights of domain name
> > > holders with those of RSPs concerned about fraudulent chargebacks.
> > >
> > > If NSI cannot reclaim unpaid domains for auction, RSPs should not be
> > > permitted to take ownership of domains either. This is a wise policy.
> > > I support it remaining as is.
> >
> > How about an across the board refund, killing the domain in the process?
> >
> >
>
>
