Re: Re[6]: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's

[Dave Warren]

> > Only difference is that NSI would lose the registration fees and charge
back
> > fees while OpenSRS loses nothing from the process as OpenSRS was paid by
the
> > RSP, not the end user.
>
> And the NSI-Registry would not lose the fee paid it by the NSI
> Registrar.

True

>
> > So as usual, you are trying to compare apples and oranges while claiming
to
> > be offering bananas.
>
> No, not at all.  If NSI-Registrar can't take possession and auction
> off unpaid domains, why should you be able to?

Once again William, you miss the point completely.  If NetSol receives a
charge back, NSI gets their money still, but NetSol doesn't.  If OpenSRS
gets a charge back, NSI keeps their money, OpenSRS keeps their money.  The
only one that gets the shaft is the RSP.

See the difference?