> > I completely follow you - and that is why I personally support option 2, it > is actually much simpler to do. However, I recognize the value of option > three, and care more about what resellers think than my personal opinion. Well no, that kind of misses the point. How we are charged by OpenSRS has nothing to do with how we charge the customers - they are totally separate. If client A buys 10 ticks of xxx.biz, and client B does likewise - and then client B ends up winning - I can simply either refund A (if I charged up-front) or invoice B (if I didn't). The OpenSRS system only deals in RSP credits - nothing more. Kirk
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Scott Allan
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Kirk Fletcher
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Scott Allan
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Chuck Hatcher
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Scott Allan
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Hugh Blair
- Re[2]: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz an... William X. Walsh
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) David Harris
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .... Scott Allan
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... David Harris
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... Kirk Fletcher
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... Scott Allan
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... David Harris
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... Scott Allan
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Kirk Fletcher
- Re: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Kirk Fletcher
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Robert L Mathews
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Robert L Mathews
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Scott Allan
