At 09:40 AM 5/18/01 +1000, Kirk Fletcher wrote: > > > > I completely follow you - and that is why I personally support option 2, >it > > is actually much simpler to do. However, I recognize the value of option > > three, and care more about what resellers think than my personal opinion. > >Well no, that kind of misses the point. How we are charged by OpenSRS >has nothing to do with how we charge the customers - they are totally >separate. If client A buys 10 ticks of xxx.biz, and client B does >likewise - and then client B ends up winning - I can simply either >refund A (if I charged up-front) or invoice B (if I didn't). The >OpenSRS system only deals in RSP credits - nothing more. Fair. I suppose I see an advantage in aligning the logic as much as possible, but, that is just me! :) sA Scott Allan Director OpenSRS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Kirk Fletcher
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Scott Allan
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Chuck Hatcher
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Scott Allan
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Hugh Blair
- Re[2]: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz an... William X. Walsh
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) David Harris
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .... Scott Allan
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... David Harris
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... Kirk Fletcher
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... Scott Allan
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... David Harris
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz a... Scott Allan
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Kirk Fletcher
- Re: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Kirk Fletcher
- Re: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Robert L Mathews
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Robert L Mathews
- RE: Fw: Reseller Update (.biz and .info) Scott Allan
