JS Shiller wrote:
> Do you suppose the market research firm conducted Condit's lie detector
> test?
:)
I heard that after Condit conducted a lie detector test on himself
and found that he wasn't lying, he also tried himself for Levy's
kidnapping and found that he was innocent.
Regards,
Eric Longman
Atl-Connect Internet Services
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net |
| 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 |
| Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
----- Original Message -----
From: "JS Schiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Scott Allan'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 4:21 PM
Subject: RE: Read
> So the idea here is to accuse everyone arround you of anticompetitive
> behavior you're using - then change the scenario a little so your ploy
> is not real obvious then dig into your corporate goodwill / Nasdaq
> stature to establish credibility for your claim.
>
> <blink, blink>
>
> Well, they're getting punch-drunk.
>
> Bet there was a time when Tucows wasn't even on radar that they would
> have laughed at the idea of Tucows being #3 with a bullet.
>
> Do you suppose the market research firm conducted Condit's lie detector
> test?
>
>
>
>
> I think Darryl was right about doing any sort of business with these
> corporate shit-demons (sorry, it just seemed *so* appropriate).
>
>
> -s
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Allan
> > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:22 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Read
> >
> >
> > this:
> >
> > http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/168146.html
> >
> > sA
> > Scott Allan
> > Director OpenSRS
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
