You know, there's a grain of truth in the Verisign accusations, although the
idea that users are being "slammed" is laughable. I imagine a significant
percentage of domain transfers are done without the owner's knowledge. Of
course, many of those owners don't have a clue what a registrar is and
couldn't care less. The people initiating the transfers are the resellers
of any number of other registrars. Somewhere in there, there _will_ be a
few domain owners that didn't want the domain to be transferred away from
NSI.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "JS Schiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Scott Allan'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: Read
> So the idea here is to accuse everyone arround you of anticompetitive
> behavior you're using - then change the scenario a little so your ploy
> is not real obvious then dig into your corporate goodwill / Nasdaq
> stature to establish credibility for your claim.
>
> <blink, blink>
>
> Well, they're getting punch-drunk.
>
> Bet there was a time when Tucows wasn't even on radar that they would
> have laughed at the idea of Tucows being #3 with a bullet.
>
> Do you suppose the market research firm conducted Condit's lie detector
> test?
>
>
>
>
> I think Darryl was right about doing any sort of business with these
> corporate shit-demons (sorry, it just seemed *so* appropriate).
>
>
> -s
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Allan
> > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:22 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Read
> >
> >
> > this:
> >
> > http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/168146.html
> >
> > sA
> > Scott Allan
> > Director OpenSRS
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
