> (I'm speaking mostly about > the lack of a date-validation on the trademark-date field) > Actually, it's quite good that they did *not* do this. Otherwise people would have just entered "correct" dates. Fraudulent registrations are now much easier identifiable (if they would just do that ...). Kai -- Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Dave Warren
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Scott Allan
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Swerve
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Elliot Noss
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Marc Schneiders
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kris Benson
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Michael L. Dean
- Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
