At 04:33 PM 9/7/01 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >Dare I ask again what Tucows is going to do to save our business? I assure we are actively participating in seeking resolution to this. I hope you can appreciate that this is not easy, as we are only one of many participating organizations. For the record, we violently opposed the sunrise approach adopted by Afilias from day one, as we were pretty confident it was not going to work out. Regards, sA
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Dave Warren
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Scott Allan
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Swerve
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Elliot Noss
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Marc Schneiders
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kris Benson
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Michael L. Dean
- Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re[4]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .inf... Steve Poirier
- Re: Re[4]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .inf... Peter Kiem
- Re[6]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
