Dare I ask again what Tucows is going to do to save our business?

> I also ask Tucows to step in here. Tucows is a share holder of Afilias and Tucows is 
> our direct partner if it comes to dealing with Afilias. Some days ago I went thru 
>the 
> pre-reg list in the RWI and canceled more than 50% of our orders because they had 
> fraudulently been taken during Sunrise. There is no doubt about at least 95% of 
>these 
> cancellations that the registration didn't meet the Afilias minimum criteria. So, we 
> (and Tucows) lost 50% of potential business for info pre-reg names. I'm certain that 
>it 
> is more or less the same with other RSP's. We and Tucows are losing money because of 
> this in great deal. I don't think that Tucows can just step aside and point at 
>Afilias. 
> This matter does not only cause the loss of money for all of us, it also shakes the 
> complete credibility of info domains and the registration process, in general it 
>casts 
> a shadow of doubt on all participating registrars and resellers.
> Some people pointed out in the past that Afilias made clear to some extent that they 
> would not police the Sunrise period. I don't know about this, but it simply doesn't 
> matter. If you put up such a page:
> http://www.afilias.info/press-room/releases/release-20010725-1.html
> which says:
> 
> > Sunrise Period Requirements & Restrictions 
> > 
> > Those wishing to reserve their marks in the .INFO domain during the Sunrise Period
> > must own a current trademark or service mark having national effect prior to 
>October
> > 2, 2000. Requests for domain names of corresponding trademarks or service marks 
>must
> > be for only the ASCII characters identical to the textual or word elements of the
> > mark only; however, hyphens may be used between spaces within a registered mark.
> >
> 
> you have to enforce these rules or you betray anyone reading the page and playing by 
> the rules. If you don't there's no excuse. If you put up rules you have to stand by 
> these rules or you have to refrain from giving any rules.
> I also read at www.domebase.com that there was at least one registrar actively
> encouraging fraudulent registrations. They should have been thrown out of the 
> consortium immediately. Failure to do so shows again that Afilias is not playing by 
> their own rules. (The page at www.domebase.com is an interesting read, although 
>poorly 
> and confusingly edited and layouted, I encourage everyone to read it if he didn't 
> already do so.)
> 
> So, what is Tucows planning to save our business here?
> 
> (I'm not a native English speaker, so please bear with me if I used inappropriate or 
> harsh wording.)
> 
> Kai
> 
> --
> 
> Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
> IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
> ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
>



Kai

--

Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com



Reply via email to