did you guys throw jello or something in your violent opposition? swerve > From: Scott Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 10:51:40 -0400 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) > > At 04:33 PM 9/7/01 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Dare I ask again what Tucows is going to do to save our business? > > > I assure we are actively participating in seeking resolution to this. I > hope you can appreciate that this is not easy, as we are only one of many > participating organizations. For the record, we violently opposed the > sunrise approach adopted by Afilias from day one, as we were pretty > confident it was not going to work out. > > Regards, > > sA > >
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Dave Warren
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Scott Allan
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Swerve
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Elliot Noss
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Marc Schneiders
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kris Benson
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Michael L. Dean
- Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re[4]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .inf... Steve Poirier
- Re: Re[4]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .inf... Peter Kiem
- Re[6]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Ross Wm. Rader
