At 01:02 PM 12/20/01 -0800, George Kirikos wrote: >Hello, > >--- Scott Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ICANN is very aware of the ambiguity of this "state", they have > > received > > thousands of complaints about the number one offender (Veri^H^H), who > > > > "re-possess" the names and auction them off... > >OpenSRS shouldn't be trying to join NSI then! Hold your head high and >think of the long-term implications of this "experiment", instead of >doing what is essentially what NSI would like to do.
Very fair comment. I was not using this as a defense of what we are doing - *because we are not doing that*. I only brought it up to illustrate the context of my previous points. The "if they jumped off a cliff" argument is well understood. When we have an firm product concept, we will test it out with our resellers. If you reject it, we won't do it, or we will evolve it to your satisfaction... Regards, sA
