>> entity to be the owner of a domain. "Tucows marked for deletion" >> is not a legal entity and cannot be the "owner" of a domain ...
No, but "Tucows" *is* a legal entity, and could not possibly be confused with anybody else. The fact that there's additional information in the record does not diminish the fact that it's clearly labelled as a "Tucows" domain. Arguing otherwise is simply pedantic tomfoolery. Regards, Eric Longman Atl-Connect Internet Services +-------------------------------------------------------+ | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net | | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 | | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +-------------------------------------------------------+ ----- Original Message ----- From: "zxcvb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:30 AM Subject: RE: Tucows domain deletions >This practice is common with other registrars as well. When a customer >requests deletion it is often "marked for deletion" this way and either >deleted later or in the expiry phase. There's no conspiracy behind this. The point of this is that there is an ICANN requirement for a legal entity to be the owner of a domain. "Tucows marked for deletion" is not a legal entity and cannot be the "owner" of a domain regardless of what anyone else does. Theoretically an UDRP or law suit could be brought in the period where the domain has this owner. Your discussion of "conspiracy" is an attempt to divert attention from the facts.
