Hello,

We can send you the Registry report from Verisign. Let NSI argue with
itself :)

FWIW, this happens all the time. It is a limitation of the Registry. We
avoid it by allowing domains past due to be transferred.

NSI/Registrar uses it as a revenue generator...
-- 

Robert Rivers
OpenSRS Technical Operations
http://www.opensrs.org/Support_FAQ.shtml

Subscriber wrote:
> 
> I have a problem between two registrars. I asked for a domain to be
> transferred from Netsol to Tucows in early December. Because the
> domain  had one of the old [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses, it
> expired on 12 Dec before I could confirm the transfer. Then Netsol refused
> to transfer unless I paid them for a further year. I paid on Dec 31 for the
> period 12 Dec 2001 to 12 Dec 2002, and they transferred on Jan 3 2002. But
> Tucows only renewed it to Dec 2002.
> 
> When I queried them, I get two assertions:
> 
> 1) Netsol : It could not have been transferred unless you renewed it. We
> did renew the date, and can email you an invoice showing a renewal date of
> 2002.
> 
> 2) Opensrs (aka Tucows, via register4less): We always add on time to the
> existing date. If the current renewal date is now Dec 2002, we must have
> received the domain dated Dec 2001.
> 
> So I have two stories, each making an assertion on what "must have"
> happened. Is there any electronic record of this transaction that will
> provide documentary proof of what the renewal date of the domain was at the
> time of transfer? How would I get that?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Patrick O'Beirne
> 
>   Patrick O'Beirne, Director.
>   Systems Modelling Ltd., Ireland.
>   http://www.sysmod.com/

-- 

Robert Rivers
OpenSRS Technical Operations
http://www.opensrs.org/Support_FAQ.shtml

Reply via email to