Saturday, Saturday, January 19, 2002, 10:59:19 AM, ezgoing8 wrote: > 2. His ISP if the ISP prevent him from receiving the notification.
Which is another reason ISPs shouldn't filter their customers email, but provide tools for customer to manage the filters themselves, or at least to opt out of the filtering without having to change ISPs. > While we are not concerned about losing such a law suit it would cost us to > defend ourselves if he does file suit and we are a party to the suit. Im my experience, most of these people are just full of hot air, and think that threatening a lawsuit will give them a better chance of getting you to do something you might not otherwise do. They tend to go away when they realize that doesn't work. All of that said, I Agree with your assessment, and I sincerely hope that OpenSRS does not even testbed a product along the lines of the one that was done in December. I also highly doubt they are going to do that. However, if the product was more along the lines of a snapnames like service, where the domain is actually released to the registry, I think that is an option worth exploring, and removes almost all of my ethical issues with the deleted domain service. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- "There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer interprets the truth." -- Jean Giradoux
