We still haven't gotten the full story yet from all registrants involved, primary indication is this appeared (to our system) like a legitimate change. This is something that compliance does not need to be involved in (preliminary investigation)
Charles Daminato OpenSRS Product Manager Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Roger B.A. Klorese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: March 18, 2002 10:09 AM > To: Charles Daminato > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: hijacking, AGAIN > > > At 10:00 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Charles Daminato wrote: > >Roger, > > > >hijacking/stolen domains are a very rare occurence. The cost of > having 24/7 > >compliance (who would not be very effective outside business > hours, except > >perhaps a shoulder to cry on) would be likely prohibitive and > perhaps fall > >onto the OpenSRS reseller to help subsidize the cost. > Discussions will have > >to be held internally on the viability of introducing something > like this. > > > As I said: since in this case "compliance determination" was > entirely from > web server and application logs, it sounds like it would have been quite > effective. >
