What is "all the paperwork" that everyone is talking about?
Couldn't the "redemption" system be designed more efficiently/intelligently?

Swerve

> From: "ezgoing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:32:45 -0600
> To: "Loren Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Re: [redemption period]]
> 
> A.  My domains are due over a period of time and most are set for automatic
> renew  but that really doesn't matter.   Let's assume they are all due on
> the same day and are not set for automatic renew.
> 
> B.  OpenSRS sends out a series of messages, starting 90 days before
> expiration.   I renew my domains when I receive this message if they are not
> set for automatic renewal.   So my domains never expire.
> 
> If I am short of cash,  I can renew them at the rate of 30 per pay period,
> starting with the first notice.   So again my domain never expire.
> 
> 
> C.  If I wait till the day my domains are due to expire and something
> happens to me,  then it is my fault that I have not already renewed those
> domains prior to expiration.  After all, OpenSRS sent me a series of
> warnings to renew plus my reseller sent me two notices the last week prior
> to expiration, at least my reseller did if my reseller was me.  So if they
> do expire, given the number of notices that I have been sent asking me to
> renew, it is only my fault that they expired.  No matter what happens to me
> on the day of expiration it is still my fault that I waited and allowed them
> to expire.  But even then I have at least 40 days to recover them before
> redemption kicks in.  So do I now wait an additional 40 days as I know I can
> renew them during the hold period?  And whose fault is it if I also miss
> renewing them during the hold period?
> 
> Of course this is a money grab on the part of Verisign.   No one in their
> right mind can doubt that.   However for those who do not pay on time it
> beats the old system in which the domain name is dropped at the end of the
> 45 day hold period and a speculator grabs it using his superior scripts
> and/or direct connections.  Then the client must pay the speculator $1500
> plus to get the domain back.   If the speculator will sell it that cheap.  I
> just tried to buy a domain from a speculator who is using it for a
> advertising portal.   Nothing special, just a combination of five letters
> that matched a client's business name.   The price quoted was $30,000.00 as
> the speculator claims the domain earns him $5000 per year in click through
> revenue.  Which may or may not be true.
> 
> However my point is that the price that OpenSRS is charging is not that
> unreasonable given the paperwork that is required by Verisign to regain the
> domain name during the redemption period.  And OpenSRS did not tell me this,
> I found this out from another Registrar whom I am on very good terms with
> the reseller manager.  She states that they hope to receive very few
> redemption requests due to the volume of paperwork required to secure the
> return of the domain name.
> 
> This is a matter of personal responsibility.  The client must take some
> responsibility for keeping their contact information up to date and for
> renewing their domains when they receive the renewal notices.  If they don't
> then I don't have sympathy for them when they whine, blaming the Registrar
> (or me!) for their domain being deleted and registered by somebody else.
> 
> And I hate the concept of the Redemption period.  This friend of mine at the
> Registrar hates the Redemption Period concept.   I would prefer to see the
> domain deleted at the end of the hold period and made available to somebody
> that might use it to host a site, not hold on to it for speculation or
> future use.  She hates it for the additional work and headaches it causes
> them.  Plus all the complaints about the high cost of Redemption she expects
> to receive from resellers.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Loren Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ezgoing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [Re: [redemption period]]
> 
> 
> Our friend EZGoing gets hit by a car.
> 
> It so happens that his 175 inactive domains are due THAT day but EZGoing
> must
> spend his $1,750 for emergency treatment, in addition to losing the next six
> weeks of work.
> 
> After a miserable recovery, EZGoing is discharged on the very day that the
> first 100 of his 175 domains go into Redemption Grace. How wonderful.
> Verisign
> and our naive committee members have saved the day! He only owes $15,000 to
> $20,000 for being forty days late on his $1,000 payment. He's late and
> nothing
> else matters. No excuses allowed.
> 
> EZGoing, however, gladly pays up because he believes that, "$20,000 is not
> that high to recover from the mistake of not renewing on time."
> 
> Suck it up folks. Redemption Grace was not really meant to protect consumers
> but to line the pockets of Verisign. Was it Martin Luther who wisely
> observed,
> "If the Pope can empty Purgatory for the price of an Indulgence, why doesn't
> he do it out of love?" Redemption? Grace? When you're being extorted for
> twice
> the price of WLS -- and 15- 20 times the renewal fee-- think of this payment
> as a spiritual awakening!
> 
> Please don't get me wrong. I'm glad we have a Redemption Grace period, as it
> is the lesser of two evils -- total lose being the other! Yet, it's just
> SICK
> to see domain holders victimized for using it! Say "Grace" everyone.
> 
> Loren
> www.Evil.Biz
> 
> 
> 
> "ezgoing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually from what I have been told this is a manual process that requires a
> lot of paperwork by the registrar to regain the domain from Verisign.
> Paperwork requires manpower which requires expense.  So $150 or $200 may not
> be that high.  And I believe $75 or $85 of that fee goes to Verisign.
> 
> And there truly isn't any excuse to lose a domain name when you currently
> have 40 + days from expiration to renew the domain at the normal renewal
> rate.  If a client does not realize his domain is not working prior to 45
> days then the domain must not have been that important.  If the domain is
> that important, then $200 is not that high to recover from the mistake on
> not renewing on time.
> 
> I own 250 domains out of which I use about 75.   I owned more until the
> change in .org and I decided not to keep the .org of these domains.  I know
> when my domains are due to expire and I definitely know when one of my
> working domains goes down.  I never wait till the last minute to renew.
> 
> I have heard the argument that the domain may not be active and the client
> forgot about it or was too busy at the time.  But I don't have much sympathy
> for this type of client.   OpenSRS sends out a series of renewal notices in
> our name plus we send out a final notice five days prior to expiration and a
> final final the day before deletion.  If the client ignores all these
> notices then the client must take responsibility for losing the domain name
> or now, pay the redemption fee to recover the domain name.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Loren Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Readington.Com TLD support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [redemption period]
> 
> 
>> Well, I realize that this outrageous fee is the result of Verisign's
> policy,
>> but have we set an all time record for egregious late fees: 1500%!
>> 
>> If this were banking people would go to jail for that. Better pay those
>> renews!
>> 
>> Loren
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> "Readington.Com TLD support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Client wants to turn on his domain after 45 day grass period so the domain
>> is now in redemption period, I've been advised by opensrs that there is
>> $150ish charge by them plus renewal.
>> 
>> If client does not want to pay;
>> 
>> Is there any other means to turn this back on or am I stuck waiting the 75
>> days till it 'officialy' expires. And is that 75day rule solid?
>> 
>> thks
>> 
>> -steve
>> readington computers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to