Ambrose, I don't even see an argument to be had. Everyone is saying, "we need balance" in one way or another. But when they say it they are just saying that this direction is too much, or that direction is too much. Everyone from their diff POVs see some other direction as that which needs to be balanced towards or away from. But everyone is saying the same thing.
This all started b/c Ali is in a situation where the classic user (he who uses the product) is all but disregarded. So he is just asking for balance towards consideration. B/c he's in that extreme environment, "balance" means strong evangelism and so the language and tone it exudes is stronger and more targeted. Andrei is sick of UCD folks who preach about the glories of UCD on high without realizing that there more pieces to the puzzle and many ways to consider "the user" beyond classical UCD methods. I don't see any arguments here, just different POVs. -- dave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=45169 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
