Anonymous, er, 'creatively masked' is interesting, but I'm generally more interested in knowing attributions. But I see the value either way, with the caveot that true anonymity is implausible with current technology.
On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Tom Perrine wrote: > One way to solve this might be a list with no replies to the list: "If > anyone has info about company X, or working with person B, please contact me > directly". People can use throwaway anonymous accounts for their inquiries > or responses if they think that's important. > > Or just subscribe to the list and have discussions from anonymous accounts, > too, I guess. > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Jo Rhett <[email protected]> wrote: > After a very interesting chat with some colleagues, it brought up the need > for a "private" place for the kind of hallway conversations that can only > happen at conferences or bars right now. > > I'm wondering if other people would be interested in a closed list for > discussing employers and job opportunities? This closed list would be useful > for inquiring about others have work or have worked at companies, and how > they feel about the place and/or discussions about how to productively > introduce new ideas into a company. > > -- > Jo Rhett > Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet > projects. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ > -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
