On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Derek Balling wrote: > It just requires some work. But that's the level of security you're going to > want-need before anyone's going to be bitching about their boss on a mailing > list.
I'm not sure that anyone is inspired enough to do the work. And trust me, people bitch about their boss in private LJ, Facebook and G+ groups all the time. I can't imagine that anyone truly believes that what they say there will never get out. I also suspect that most people, like someone suggested, would reply offlist for any serious allegations. It is my personal belief that "widely viewed" is much more useful in this context than "truly private". We all have closed circles in which we talk about employers. The problem is not security, it's the lack of wide availability. Many of us have reasonable concerns about certain employers or certain people that we'd be willing to share offlist. It would also provide a *slightly* safer environment for some of those same conversations that happen today in discuss@lopsa. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
