On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Otherwise, issue states have slightly different names,
>
> and buttons to change them have surprisingly different names.
>
> Some state changes ask for a comment.
>
> Both differences have sense, but they should be documented.
>
> (On my first log in, there was a short demo,
>
> which used a different state graph.)
>
>
>
> I have noticed BUG-{num} got converted into Jira links. Nice!
>
> I am not sure how Gerrit integration would work.
>
> Currently, many Gerrit changes contain BUG-{num} substrings
>
> in commit messages. Perhaps Jira cound contain optional field
>
> for Bugzilla number, and Gerrit could link to Jira search for the value?
>
> (I assume Gerrit would linkify
>
> the new {PROJECT}-{num} strings correctly.)
>
Regarding these points, I see that issues in the "IN PROGRESS" state have
buttons called "Check-In Fix" and "Needs Review". The first one moves the
state to "RESOLVED" and doesn't ask for any comment, and the second one
moves it to "IN REVIEW", again no comment asked. It would be nice to be
able to add a Gerrit link for both, so that we know which commit fixed the
issue or which patch needs review. Maybe that's possible in a way that I
haven't figured out yet?
-Lori
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
