We have done this in the past, but every few months we keep being told "we shouldn't discuss that on an archived list. This seems like an excellent time to set up an option to do just that. On Apr 7, 2013 7:54 PM, "Mak Kolybabi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013-04-07 19:25, Roswyne wrote: > > I support this and further propose an additional list: members only and > > unarchived, to discuss issues pertaining to SkSp as an organization and > as > > a physical space. > > I'm very much against privatizing that. Organizationally, we try to make > our > actions, plans, and decisions as open and public as possible. > > -- > Mak Kolybabi > <[email protected]> > > () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail > /\ www.asciiribbon.org | Against proprietary extensions > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
