We quickly run into mailing list hell. We have to be careful with how
many we create.

We have *a lot* of special-purpose lists that are basically completely
unused. And it could get hard for people - especially new members - to
know which ones to subscribe to or use.

Adding one more for this special purpose - as mak suggested - is
probably okay. But I'd be *very* cautious about adding more.

Ron

On 2013-04-07 22:35, Roswyne wrote:
> The problem is that another opt-in list is of limited value for what I'm
> proposing. We have the announce list that you can use to broadcast a
> message TO all members, but all responses are redirected to discuss. Also,
> afaik, subscription to announce is not limited to members.
> 
> This isn't to say that targeted mailing lists for special interests aren't
> useful, but I want to clarify what I'm requesting.
> On Apr 7, 2013 10:00 PM, "Justin Lacko" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Mak, sounds like a great idea. There shouldn't be a reason not to do it,
> > esp. if it's voluntary sign-up. If someone doesn't like it, they simply
> > don't subscribe.
> >
> > Siu/Ron: Agree that if people are being always told "don't discuss this on
> > a public list" that we should have a members-only list that members are
> > subscribed to. It will take a lot of traffic off of discuss@, if people
> > would prefer to discuss it on the members-only lists (it would be up to the
> > poster which list she/he posts to).
> >
> >
> > On 7 April 2013 20:36, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> We have done this in the past, but every few months we keep being told
> >> "we shouldn't discuss that on an archived list. This seems like an
> >> excellent time to set up an option to do just that.
> >>  On Apr 7, 2013 7:54 PM, "Mak Kolybabi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2013-04-07 19:25, Roswyne wrote:
> >>> > I support this and further propose an additional list: members only and
> >>> > unarchived, to discuss issues pertaining to SkSp as an organization
> >>> and as
> >>> > a physical space.
> >>>
> >>> I'm very much against privatizing that. Organizationally, we try to make
> >>> our
> >>> actions, plans, and decisions as open and public as possible.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Mak Kolybabi
> >>> <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail
> >>> /\  www.asciiribbon.org  | Against proprietary extensions
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> >>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> >>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >

> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to