...The number isn't on the website. It's just in the wiki.

> If no one is willing to return calls, then you're right: the number shouldn't 
> be on business cards.
Right, so I see we've entered the passive aggressive phase of the discussion.

Colin, prepare the Thunder-dome.

On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
> (shrugging)
>
> If no one is willing to return calls, then you're right: the number
> shouldn't be on business cards.
>
> By the same reasoning, perhaps we should not print it on the next batch of
> pamphlets, and take it off the website.
>
> On Aug 31, 2013 7:47 PM, "Colin Stanners" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> simple solution: after the phone number put the next "if anyone's here".
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Jay Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> "I think the cards are incomplete without our phone number."
>>> Huh? The business card police are not going to hunt you down if you
>>> create one without a phone number. I'd rather not have to explain to
>>> everybody I hand the card out to that: 1) It will almost always go to
>>> voice mail 2) if it doesn't go to voice-mail, you'll get a random
>>> member and likely not the person you need to talk to.
>>>
>>> "Can I have a tour of the space?" doesn't even register on the list of
>>> things we get phone calls for - and even if it did - that phone number
>>> is far from the best way to approach it. Brittany gets phone calls for
>>> SkullSpace Social matters, Ron gets phone calls for media queries,
>>> I'll likely get phone calls regarding C4 things, Ian will get phone
>>> calls regarding collaborations with other groups, random members will
>>> get calls for projects, events, and research they're doing. We are NOT
>>> going to tell any of our contacts to call an unmanned number to reach
>>> us.
>>>
>>> It is rude, it's useless, and frankly it's embarrassing.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > I think the cards are incomplete without our phone number.
>>> >
>>> > Leaving voicemail isn't offensive: the only potential issue I see is if
>>> > the
>>> > call isn't returned in a reasonable timeframe.  Since it'll go to the
>>> > same
>>> > people, I imagine the turnaround would be the same as emailing info@.
>>> >
>>> > If you are making a personal contact and provide your personal phone
>>> > number,
>>> > then there would naturally be different expectations when calling it,
>>> > and
>>> > that's your choice if you want to give out your own number.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks very much for working on these, and explaining how cards are
>>> > used
>>> > differently than brochures.  TIL !  :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Jay Smith <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > But I'm still not sure why we not also list the SkSp phone number.
>>> >> Mostly because it will likely end in painful frustration for queries
>>> >> other than "Is anybody at the space right now?", and also because if
>>> >> I'm giving someone a business card it's likely to facilitate follow-up
>>> >> on something very specific. For example, if it's a media person, I'm
>>> >> likely going to have them follow up to me directly so I can get them
>>> >> in touch with the board (Or I might just shamelessly give them Ron or
>>> >> Ian's number - sorry in advance guys!). It's true that the space
>>> >> voicemail does go straight to [email protected], but I'd consider it
>>> >> pretty rude if somebody gave me the phone number to a voice-mail
>>> >> system.
>>> >>
>>> >> Again, it's important to keep in mind the context in which business
>>> >> cards are given out. Traditionally, a business card is only given out
>>> >> after a personal connection is made - it's supposed to serve as a
>>> >> physical representation of that contact (Japanese business culture
>>> >> takes this to the extreme). I'm not going to give a voice-mail number
>>> >> to a good contact.
>>> >>
>>> >> Aside: As they represent personal contacts - business cards are also
>>> >> supposed to survive for a long time - this is why I'm not a fan of
>>> >> "free" business cards that fall apart easily. Leaflets and brochures
>>> >> however, are expected to have the lifespan of however long it takes to
>>> >> read them.
>>> >>
>>> >> Your earlier comments seem to indicate that you view business cards as
>>> >> a cheaper replacement for brochures. I'm afraid they don't replace
>>> >> each other so much as compliment each other.
>>> >>
>>> >> - Jay / @Sporked
>>> >>
>>> >> Ps. I understand that I'm pulling a total Patrick Bateman when it
>>> >> comes to business cards, and I apologize to everyone who sees this as
>>> >> an insane amount of bikeshedding over a piece of paper. I just really
>>> >> happen to be fascinated by the design and thought that goes into
>>> >> mundane things like this :)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > I think that looks great!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > But I'm still not sure why we not also list the SkSp phone number.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Even if it's not ideal (for instant communication), it's got
>>> >> > voicemail
>>> >> > which
>>> >> > the directors automatically receive, in much the same way the info@
>>> >> > address
>>> >> > works, afaik.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And a blank back for notes etc. Per what Jay was saying :)
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on the MTS High Speed Mobility
>>> >> > Network
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>>> >> > From: Jeremy Hiebert <[email protected]>
>>> >> > Sender: [email protected]: Fri, 30 Aug 2013
>>> >> > 17:50:37
>>> >> > To: [email protected]<[email protected]>
>>> >> > Reply-To: [email protected]
>>> >> > Subject: Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] SkSp business cards
>>> >> >
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> >> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> >> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> >> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> >> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> >> >
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> >> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> >> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to