snarlydwarf;158395 Wrote: > It is a bit unclear from your posting: in your tests, were you using the > web interface on the server (ie running firefox or whatever on the same > machine as the files)? > > That can slow things down noticably, especially on older machines -- > there are a whole lot more "context changes" and, well, web browsers do > suck. Not to mention Softsqueeze can be sorta sucky too (not that the > program itself sucks, it is impressive what it does, but Sun's Java VM > can be icky too). > > So what you end up with is the footprint of Mysql, Slimserver, > Firefox/IE/Whatever and Java... > > bem 20812 0.0 13.6 318120 34968 pts/3 S 09:26 0:00 > /home/bem/jre1.5.(etc) > > Yes, that means that Softsqueeze is, for reasons known only to Sun, > using 318M of virtual memory. Firefox is, at the moment, using only > 100M... You can easily test the web interface and scanner without any clients, either Squeezebox or software, connected to the server. I have several instances of SlimServer running on my network like this.
-- JJZolx Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30145 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
