Shaun,
I think the flaw in your logic is that there've been word processors,
referred to as word processors, which could not do the things you
claim are prerequisites of word processing applications. There is no
finite definition that I'm aware of. TextEdit falls into a gray area
where it isn't really either by the strictest definitions. Things are
rarely black-and-white. And, of course, you're also, I think,
defining word processors to some extent with the definition that
better fits page-layout software, which is an entire different category.
Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On 25 Apr, 2008, at 12:55 PM, vashaun jones wrote:
Yup, a text editor isn't a word processor. They have very distinct
functionality. Even though some have more than others you would
never get by in the corporate world with Text Edit when formatting
and such plays a major part in document editing and creation. What
if you need to create a form? You couldn't dream of doing it in Text
Edit. If you could we wouldn't be trying to get I Work accessible.
