Jacob, thanks very much for your in-depth note. I'm wondering, why
on earth would Adobe chide anyone for wanting access to their products?
… I mean, saying that basically nobody wants Flash access on Mac is a
bit over the top, is it not?… Sighted people whom use Safari, simply
have access to this as a matter of course on a day to day basis, so
something seriously seems amiss here with this kind of attitude?…
<smile> Not to play two ends against the middle here, so to speak,
but isn't this the sort of thing that the NFB / ACB should be
interested in?… I mean, this is a rather largeish corporation
blatantly locking out a segment of the population, is it not?… -All
be it, a smallish one, but a segment just the same, and based on a
disability, no less.
Sounds like a shameless stereotypical discriminatory act to me…
-Opinions?…
Have a great day!…
Smiles,
Cara :)
On Oct 17, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Jacob Schmude wrote:
Hi
Well, looking at it realistically, about the only thing we can do is
bug the hell out of Adobe until they get sick of us I guess :).
Seriously, Flash is a closed source product, so we can't change it.
Apple can't do it on their own because the flashplayer, which Apple
has no rights to, does not expose any of the flash content--it does
expose that there's a flash object there, reported by an unknown in
recent builds of Webkit, but no content is exposed through it.
Basically, Apple and Adobe might have to work together on this, so
let's bug them relentlessly--both Adobe and Apple--and maybe
something will happen. I'm suggesting bugging Apple as well, since
maybe it will take a big boy like Apple to get Adobe moving as none
of us have had any luck so far and in fact some of us have been
derided for wanting flash accessibility on OS X--derided, I might
add, by Adobe themselves. According to Adobe we should just be using
Windows, and no one wants Flash accessibility on the Mac anyway--in
other words, no demand for it. Which doesn't make sense as there's
obviously some demand or we wouldn't be bothering to email them
about it.
Either that or cross our fingers that one of the opensource flash
replacements will eventually achieve full compatibility with the
current state of flash... I'm not going to hold my breath on that
one though.
Interesting question I was pondering: exactly how much for
accessibility has Adobe done on the windows side? I'm stressing
Adobe here, as back when flash was being made accessible it was
still owned and developed by Macromedia, and I haven't seen much
improvement in the intervening time since at least not in Flash
itself. Completely unrelated to Flash access on OS X, just a
question I was pondering.
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30, Cara Quinn wrote:
I was thinking about this again this morning, and there's simply
got to be something we can do about this?…
I mean Flash is here, it's going to stay and until the next similar
tech in web design shows itself, we're going to be left out in the
cold as Mac / VO / Safari users if something isn't done. This to
me at least, is simply unacceptable. Something really does need to
change here, and fast.
I absolutely *do not* want to go to Windows so that I can browse
flash content. There's just no reason for it.
What, in people's opinions can we do about this?… How can this be
approached / dealt with?…
I for one, absolutely *need* flash access, so just asking sites not
to use it is moot.
Anyway, I'm just thinking out loud here in hopes that peeps might
chime in with opinions / ideas and such.
Thanks so much for taking time to read this and I hope you all are
having a wonderful day!
Smiles,
Cara :)
On Oct 17, 2008, at 8:13 AM, Chris Blouch wrote:
Because it's one big blob of Flash.
CB
Will Lomas wrote:
hi i wonder why this site
http://www.clairescareers.co.uk/
won't read on the mac
again all i get is HTML content no interaction possible even when
i trick safari into thinking it is internet explorer
---
View my Online Portfolio at:
http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn
---
View my Online Portfolio at:
http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn
