--- Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bealach wrote: > > > However if the PC World review of Oo2 beta is right the database is very > > much like M$ Access which PC World claims is not very good and users > > don't like it very much. > > This is very vague. Can you elaborate on exactly what is wrong with it and > what should be different? > > Suppose for example that you are making a software product. Someone comes > in and says "your product is not very good, can you make it better?". Now, > how would you respond to this person?1 > > I thought OOoBase was much superior to MS Access. For example, OOo Base > has the ability to connect to 12 different databases out of the box (e.g. > MySQL, Oracle) and many more thorugh other interfaces. By comparison MS > Access is just one database. We do have a database engine called HSQLDB > which provides a fuctionality vs ease of use tradeoff that is comparable > to that of Access. But if you wish for a different tradeoff (e.g. MySQL) > you can do that. > > Cheers, > --
He daniel. You haven't left yet? What happened? BTW: You got me on the april fools thing, but I waited to see if anything would come of it! Cheers! Rigel > Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, > Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. > http://oooauthors.org | > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
