Hi, Philipp Lohmann schrieb:
Ok, point taken. So there is a kde project that kendy at some created and you never did that for gnome. I'd agree that the kde "project" is a little bogus then as qualifying for a vote on something (although I'd certainly say the kendy is qualified for quite a lot, including project lead). Wasn't there an "incubator" project state and leads with votes are for "accepted" projects ? Would that have applied in this example ?
Yes and no :) First - you are correct, KDE is in incubator state. With the current council agenda project leads from incubator are not eligible for a council seat.
With the current draft, I'dlike to give incubator project leads also a vote, as we have very important projects in incubator (e.g. extensions, distribution). So, the sitution would be bogus (Gnome vs. KDE). But this might get resolved, if we use the list of cvs committers as suggested by Michael.
Another task would indeed be to resolve the bogus state of KDE project. As said - we need to clean up projects anyway. We have inactive projects, projects with "wrong" leads, very active incubator projects that never advanced to accepted- and projects that have never been formally submitted as such. This is a separate task - but maybe you (plus Kendy plusMichael) could give a suggestion, what should happen with KDE / gnome project. Advance it to accepted make it a sub project under gsl, mege it with gnome, so that we have a "Unix desktop integration project" or somethinglike that.
André --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
