Michael Meeks wrote:
Sure; so what I mean is someone who for all intents and purposes is
dead to the project: they turned up, sent some mail, became a project
lead, then vanished - never to be seen again. I believe Fridrich has at
least one amusing story in this regard :-)
Oh, they're both part of the gsl project I'd say. But that maybe jus me.
Well - lets not strain the example: but in terms of projects this is
not so; there is http://kde.openoffice.org/ and no
http://gnome.openoffice.org/ - which is broadly just an administrative
accident. Basing the right to vote for the council on such an accident
doesn't seem the best form of governance.
Ok, point taken. So there is a kde project that kendy at some created
and you never did that for gnome. I'd agree that the kde "project" is a
little bogus then as qualifying for a vote on something (although I'd
certainly say the kendy is qualified for quite a lot, including project
lead). Wasn't there an "incubator" project state and leads with votes
are for "accepted" projects ? Would that have applied in this example ?
Kind regards, pl
--
Someone told me: "Smile and be happy, it could be worse"
And I smiled and was happy and things became worse.
-- Author unknown
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
