Torrie, I don't have time to read your "novels". Please keep your post simple and to the point.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Buczko <[email protected]>wrote: > Ok > Thanks Chris, that makes more sense when you say it that way. > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Chris Egeland <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I'm sorry, but I'm siding with Torrie on this one. >> >> >> On 3/3/2014 11:35 AM, Justin Herman wrote: >> >> I agree with Andrew, >> >> I hold several concerns about this proposal and think we need to >> evaluate the needs of the infrastructure. >> >> The purpose of bringing up proposals on the discuss list is so that >> anyone subscribed can participate in the proposal process, member or not. >> If you wish to discuss your proposals, please bring them up on the list so >> that people subscribed can participate in the discussion. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Buczko <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> WAT? >>> >>> first you said it was $1.60 >>> >> This was the monthly increase in billing to more than quadruple our >> infrastructure's power, by implementing the original proposal. >> >> Then $16.40 >>> >> This is the monthly savings we will see if we implement this proposal >> and spend the $200 mentioned to reserve the t1.micro instances mentioned. >> >> Now it's $123.10 >>> >> This was a hypothetical number. It's the monthly cost of the >> originally proposed infrastructure (2x t1.micro, 2x m1.small, and 1x >> m1.small RDS) purchased without reservations, minus the monthly cost of the >> same infrastructure purchased with monthly reservations. It was given >> simply to illustrate how much of a monthly savings is available when >> utilizing the AWS Reserved Instances program. This number has absolutely >> nothing to do whatsoever with this current proposal. >> >> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Torrie Fischer < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Previous thread: >>>> >>>> https://synhak.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-February/003393.html >>>> >>>> I'd like to propose that we spend $200 to reserve the two t1.micro >>>> instances >>>> in that proposal for the purpose of web servers. >>>> >>>> Our current AWS expenditure is still ~$80/mo. Spending $200 up front >>>> will >>>> reduce that bill by $16.40/mo and keep our infrastructure expenses low >>>> for the >>>> next three years. Thats an extra $16.40 we can invest elsewhere with a >>>> break >>>> even point of 12 months. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Discuss mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing >> [email protected]https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
