Ok
Thanks Chris, that makes more sense when you say it that way.

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Chris Egeland <[email protected]>wrote:

>  I'm sorry, but I'm siding with Torrie on this one.
>
>
> On 3/3/2014 11:35 AM, Justin Herman wrote:
>
>  I agree with Andrew,
>
>  I hold several concerns about this proposal and think we need to evaluate
> the needs of the infrastructure.
>
> The purpose of bringing up proposals on the discuss list is so that anyone
> subscribed can participate in the proposal process, member or not.  If you
> wish to discuss your proposals, please bring them up on the list so that
> people subscribed can participate in the discussion.
>
>
>
>  On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Buczko 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> WAT?
>>
>>  first you said it was $1.60
>>
>   This was the monthly increase in billing to more than quadruple our
> infrastructure's power, by implementing the original proposal.
>
>   Then $16.40
>>
>   This is the monthly savings we will see if we implement this proposal
> and spend the $200 mentioned to reserve the t1.micro instances mentioned.
>
>   Now it's $123.10
>>
>   This was a hypothetical number.  It's the monthly cost of the
> originally proposed infrastructure (2x t1.micro, 2x m1.small, and 1x
> m1.small RDS) purchased without reservations, minus the monthly cost of the
> same infrastructure purchased with monthly reservations.  It was given
> simply to illustrate how much of a monthly savings is available when
> utilizing the AWS Reserved Instances program.  This number has absolutely
> nothing to do whatsoever with this current proposal.
>
>
>>  ?
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Torrie Fischer <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Previous thread:
>>>
>>> https://synhak.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-February/003393.html
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose that we spend $200 to reserve the two t1.micro
>>> instances
>>> in that proposal for the purpose of web servers.
>>>
>>> Our current AWS expenditure is still ~$80/mo. Spending $200 up front will
>>> reduce that bill by $16.40/mo and keep our infrastructure expenses low
>>> for the
>>> next three years. Thats an extra $16.40 we can invest elsewhere with a
>>> break
>>> even point of 12 months.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing 
> [email protected]https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to