I also didn't notice that the proposal had not come to full maturity. Guess
that will be a topic for another week.

D.
On Mar 11, 2014 4:20 PM, "Ken Burns" <[email protected]> wrote:

> We had some good discussions last night during the board meeting about the
> formation of a Community Working Group to help resolve some of the disputes
> going on in the space, and I was planning to propose the formation of the
> group via the mailing list today.   However I was notified today by some of
> those directly involved in the disputes that they would prefer to
> immediately bring the topics to a membership vote, based on the proposals
> that were previously submitted to the discuss list.  These existing
> proposals deal with the validity of the sub-lease to Something New
> Entertainment, and the voting to remove a board member and officer from
> their positions for breach of trust.
>
> Given that these items will be coming to a direct member vote immediately,
> the need for the formation of a temporary Community Working Group to
> discuss and resolve these issues is pointless, therefore I will not be
> making the proposal to create this group.
>
> All of the members involved in these disputes are very passionate about
> SYN/HAK and essential to our long term success - and in talking with
> everyone we're really not that far apart in our thinking about what is best
> for us.  Please, let's try to find some common ground and starting working
> again together to build up the space into something great.  Let's get back
> to being excellent to each other again.
>
> I will not be attending the meeting tonight, as I'd prefer to remain
> impartial on these matters for now.
>
> Ken
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Ken Burns
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 3:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [SH-Members] Fwd: Akron Makerspace
>
> With all the heated discussions currently going on, I recommend that we
> take a pause to get some things figured out and to hopefully chill out a
> bit.
>
> There is a board meeting tonight, the first of the newly elected board
> members.  I'd recommend to the board to not make any policy decisions or
> discuss in length a number of the topics or accusations that have been
> flying around tonight.  Doing so at this point will likely lead to more
> argument and further tear the community apart.
>
> I made a draft proposal to create a Community Working Group over the
> weekend, which ideally would be an independent group of members to look
> into the current set of disputes, since consensus has obviously failed on
> several topics.  I plan on coming to the board meeting for a short bit
> tonight, and I would like to finalize the wording of this proposal for an
> official submission to the full membership at tomorrow meeting and on the
> discuss list.
>
> If we can come to an agreement to allow this group to help resolve these
> disputes, can was also agree as a membership to chill out for the time
> being on the following topics:
>
> - Lease of racks to a Something New Entertainment
> - Votes to remove of any board member or officer from their position for
> breach of trust
> - Discussions on any policy changes, such as Drug Policy, illegal activity
> policies, etc
> - Breaking up SYN/HAK into different parts (aka Hackerspace / Makerspace)
>
> I look forward to meeting tonight, and also tomorrow night at the standard
> meeting, to discuss the formation of a Community Working Group, and also to
> not discussing the other items at this point, until said group has its
> chance to review the issues in an independent way.
>
> There is a way forward out of this mess, let's just give it a chance and
> hold off on the arguments for a while.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ken
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Torrie Fischer
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 2:43 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [SH-Members] Fwd: Akron Makerspace
>
> On Monday, March 10, 2014 12:30:56 Michael Griesacker wrote:
> > oops, that was for everyone
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Michael Griesacker <[email protected]>
> > Date: Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [SH-Members] Akron Makerspace
> > To: Torrie Fischer <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > I think Synhak is already a healthy part makerspace, although we're
> > not trying to push out the hackers. I did read the article, and think
> > that we have developed into what we are as we evolved from our humble
> > beginnings. I don't see the need to try to separate the two at this
> > stage, and I think that trying to do so denies what we've built so far
> > as a community.  -but I will try to remain open about that.
>
> Based on these recent developments regarding the heavy handed attempt to
> use the board for dictating how we approach community issues and the
> vitriolic responses I get in my inbox every day, I think there is certainly
> a demand for a more regulated and top-down approach to governance along
> traditional business lines.
>
> Hence, a makerspace.
>
> I don't think starting a makerspace would break apart the community as
> much as it would provide an outlet for some of these managerial and
> anti-communal energies. Plus, it'd be a much better platform for the formal
> education initiatives that others want to use SYNHAK for.
>
> I'd say that this stuff has been developing for the past 7 months or so.
> Its time we had a serious conversation about this, likely using the CWG
> framework that Ken proposed. I feel that the decision to step forward and
> build a makerspace could spring forth as a compromise between those who
> feel that renting out SYNHAK to startups is an acceptable use of the space
> and those who do not.
>
> If I'm not building SYNHAK or making bank, I'm spending my time working on
> OSC and helping rebuild the economic situation in Akron. I'm not against
> cheap rent for startups who want to get things moving, but renting out a
> hackerspace is way beyond reason.
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Torrie Fischer
> >
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > Hi, members@ and board@.
> > >
> > > Is there interest in starting a real Makerspace here in Akron, or is
> > > this effort to re-appropriate SYNHAK into one going to continue?
> > >
> > > I need to know, so I can figure out when I should give up fighting
> > > and start looking to sell my house and skip town. I'm pretty tired
> > > of beating my head against this wall of opposition and seeing this
> > > community shared goal of a hacker collective dry up before my eyes.
> > >
> > > If you're not sure of the difference, please thoroughly read this
> > > link I posted on friday:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://makezine.com/2013/05/22/the-difference-between-hackerspaces-m
> > > akersp
> > > aces-techshops-and-fablabs/
> > >
> > > Here's what Noisebridge is all about, which was the basis for
> > > starting
> > > SYNHAK:
> > >
> > > http://noisebridge.net/wiki/Vision
> > >
> > > I really do want to know if your vision for SYNHAK is incompatible
> > > with mine.
> > > It certainly feels like the community is intent on taking this idea
> > > and transforming it at its very foundations.
> > >
> > > If y'all want a Makerspace, let me know. It can happen, we don't
> > > have to argue about it, and it can coexist with SYNHAK. There is a
> > > $3.7 million grant from the state of ohio already coming to Akron to
> > > build one in the morley health center, but the people building it
> > > have no idea about the makers and hackers in the city. I'd rather
> > > the expertise from SYNHAK continues to do awesome things instead of
> > > being swiftly extinguished.
> > >
> > > Here's the details about the Makerspace grant:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/20140223/SUB1/302239986/1072/
> > > TOC?Pr
> > > ofile=1072&template=printart
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Members mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/members
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/members
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/members
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to