On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 17:30:34 Justin Herman wrote: > Really want to stop fighting? Stop posting.
True. Posting to discuss@ has never gotten any real response from you or Devin about any of this. Always more handwaving or just silence. I'm trying to have a serious discussion here. Actually, I've been trying since December. Why wasn't there a board vote, and on what basis did Devin have the legal authority to sign this sublease on behalf of SYNHAK? Could you please answer those questions for all to see? Alternatively, we could go back to agreeing that the CWG is a solution. I await your well reasoned response. > > On Tuesday, March 11, 2014, Torrie Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 14:14:46 alex kot wrote: > > > So is yelling at a overweight kid for being fat. Difference between > > > > facts > > > > > and just being unethical. Also we decided to wait till after we get the > > > working comunity going before we discuss this on discuss correct? I > > > > recall > > > > > that was a topic at the board meeting. > > > > You are absolutely correct on both points. > > > > I would appreciate it if Devin would acknowledge this and we could go > > through > > with the CWG. I agreed to letting the CWG happen. I'm more than happy to > > stop > > discussing it. I'm tired of fighting and was looking forwards to this > > break. > > > > Guess thats not happening. Lets continue the parade of non-discussion. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 5:09 PM EDT Torrie Fischer wrote: > > > >On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 17:05:18 Justin Herman wrote: > > > >> Please stop attacking people on the discuss list. > > > > > > > >How was I attacking anyone? > > > > > > > >Are these not facts? > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Torrie Fischer > > > > > > > ><[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> > On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 16:41:45 Devin Wolfe wrote: > > > >> > > I also didn't notice that the proposal had not come to full > > > > maturity. > > > > > >> > Guess > > > >> > > > > >> > > that will be a topic for another week. > > > >> > > > > >> > You signed a sublease without having the legal authority to do so. > > > >> > > > > >> > You sidestepped all calls for discussion about this sublease. > > > >> > > > > >> > You wanted the board to immediately approve a drug policy without > > > >> > community > > > >> > feedback or discussion. > > > >> > > > > >> > You called for an "emergency" board meeting behind everyone's back > > > > and > > > > > >> > had > > > >> > to > > > >> > be told by Omar that it isn't permitted in the bylaws. > > > >> > > > > >> > You rushed out to tell people that we're voting on a proposal that > > > > is > > > > > >> > only > > > >> > four days old. > > > >> > > > > >> > Do you even know how SYNHAK works? > > > >> > > > > >> > *Do you not see why I find you unfit for the position of Champion?* > > > >> > > > > >> > > D. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Mar 11, 2014 4:20 PM, "Ken Burns" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > We had some good discussions last night during the board > > > >> > > > meeting > > > >> > > > about > > > >> > > > > >> > the > > > >> > > > > >> > > > formation of a Community Working Group to help resolve some of > > > > the > > > > > >> > > > disputes > > > >> > > > going on in the space, and I was planning to propose the > > > > formation > > > > > >> > > > of > > > >> > > > > >> > the > > > >> > > > > >> > > > group via the mailing list today. However I was notified > > > > today by > > > > > >> > some > > > >> > > > > >> > > > of > > > >> > > > those directly involved in the disputes that they would prefer > > > > to > > > > > >> > > > immediately bring the topics to a membership vote, based on the > > > >> > > > > >> > proposals > > > >> > > > > >> > > > that were previously submitted to the discuss list. These > > > > existing > > > > > >> > > > proposals deal with the validity of the sub-lease to Something > > > > New > > > > > >> > > > Entertainment, and the voting to remove a board member and > > > > officer > > > > > >> > > > from > > > >> > > > their positions for breach of trust. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Given that these items will be coming to a direct member vote > > > >> > > > > >> > immediately, > > > >> > > > > >> > > > the need for the formation of a temporary Community Working > > > > Group > > > > > >> > > > to > > > >> > > > discuss and resolve these issues is pointless, therefore I will > > > > not > > > > > >> > > > be > > > >> > > > making the proposal to create this group. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > All of the members involved in these disputes are very > > > > passionate > > > > > >> > > > about > > > >> > > > SYN/HAK and essential to our long term success - and in talking > > > >> > > > with > > > >> > > > everyone we're really not that far apart in our thinking about > > > > what > > > > > >> > > > is > > > >> > > > best > > > >> > > > for us. Please, let's try to find some common ground and > > > > starting > > > > > >> > working
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
