On 18/01/13 00:07, Greg Zartman wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2013 1:01 PM, "Gordon Rowell" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Deleting everything to do with the failed board and related documents > would be a good start (or, better, move them to a "do not repeat" area). > > I actually started down the path with Peter Walter of setting up a new > organizational structure for the SME project. The current structure is > very cumbersome and has way too many useless details. > > Id be happy to pass off were we left off with this and/or pitch in where > I can.
Yes, it was very ambitious, and I am suggesting we have something much smaller and flexible. You have made a great offer - do you think you can put together some ideas ? I think, as has being suggested, we need some communal places to stick some of this stuff for discussion - I have made comment on another reply about where and how. > > The real issue though is that this project isnt going anywhere without > at least one real developer devoting time to it. Both Charlie and > Shad(charlie more than Shad) have made it clear they arent going to do > this unless they are getting paid. > > Unless we address this issue, SME is just going to limp along like it > has for the last couple years and likely wither and die in the next few > years. > Indeed. It's a vitally important situation that needs addressing. I have been giving it some serious thought myself. We obviously need a plan of what people feel they want to see happen, and then figure out out how we execute it. Again, this needs writing, posting, and discussing. B. Rgds John _______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail [email protected] Searchable archive at http://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
