אני חושב שמישהו צודק. On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Lior Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote:
> אני שמח לראות שאתה שומר על המסורת של לקרוא לי "מישהו". > > המטרה במעבר לוורדפרס היא לא טכנית אלה ניהולית - אני רוצה > לאפשר לאנשים שלא מכירים קוד (ולא צריכים להכיר) לעזור בתחזוקת > האתר. ממש לא בא לי להתעסק עם המרה של נתונים למבנה XMLי > כדי שיתאים לתבנית שהאתר דורש. > > במקום ש-linux.org.il יכיל את המידע הכי עדכני יש לנו אתר שלא ממש > עומד בדרישה של להוות שער לקהילה ולעסקים בארץ. > > ולא ממש איכפת לי אם יקח לעוד עוד שניה לעלות, העיקר שהמידע שיוצג > יהיה רלוונטי. > > קפלן > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> recently someone requested me to implement something on >> http://www.linux.org.il/ and after I was distracted and explained the >> fact that >> it is a custom PHP site that parses XML at run-time and converts it to >> HTML, >> and that there is no apparent need why it should be a dynamic site, he >> said he >> thinks he'll just install WordPress there and allow people to edit the >> site. >> >> I think it's a bad idea. As opposed to WordPress and similar CMSes, >> static XHTML >> sites that are generated from templates have the following advantages: >> >> 1. They are more secure. WordPress had a very bad track record of security >> vulnerabilities in the past, and other PHP (see >> http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/php/ ) and MySQL (see >> http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/mysql/ )-based content >> management systems are usually prone to other problems like that. >> Please don't focus exclusively on this point. >> >> 2. They are much more reliable than a dynamic site. A static XHTML site is >> generated from templates which is maintained in a version control system >> (nowadays it can be a distributed one, where every copy has the entire >> history), and can be built and reuploaded at any time. The PHP and MySQL >> CMSes >> tend to get offline (often permanently - see the links I gave) due to many >> problems, and then restoring them is incredibly painful. Some MediaWiki >> site >> that are now offline are: >> >> * http://perl.net.au/ >> >> * http://wiki.perl.org.il/ >> >> * http://wiki.osdc.org.il/ >> >> * http://www.iglu.org.il/wiki/ >> >> 3. They can be made more structured than a CMS that just gives you a big >> HTML >> editing textarea, where you often have to duplicate markup, or in the >> case of >> MediaWiki, something much more vile and unstructured. >> >> 4. They are faster to load and consume less resources than a >> server-side-scripted CMS. >> >> -------------------- >> >> Naturally, dynamic CMSes have some advantages such as the ability to add >> user-generated content, and they might be more friendly to laymen, but >> this is >> not relevant to http://www.linux.org.il/ which is a static portal. >> >> If you're looking for a solution that combines some of the best of both >> worlds >> look at ikiwiki : http://ikiwiki.info/ ; >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikiwiki . >> This is a wiki engine that stores its pages as files in a distributed >> version >> control system. >> >> Regards, >> >> Shlomi Fish >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ >> What does "Zionism" mean? - http://shlom.in/def-zionism >> >> No one calls Xena the warrior princess “Zeena” to her face and survives. >> Luckily for you, she hasn’t visited the modern day United States yet. >> >> Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply. >> _______________________________________________ >> Discussions mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discussions mailing list > [email protected] > http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions >
_______________________________________________ Discussions mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions
