On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:15 AM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io <http://mailto:don...@stufft.io> wrote:
> > On May 10, 2016, at 11:00 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> > wrote: > > > > (as an aside, if there's the question of forking an existing parser > > implementation for better vendorability, forking a YAML parser may be > > more useful to third-party folks than forking a TOML parser :-)) > > > I’m seeing what I can come up with (https://github.com/dstufft/yaml) > though > I don’t know that I feel like actually maintaining whatever it is I end up > figuring out there. > Did you intend to fork from https://github.com/yaml/pyyaml? I believe the latest PyYAML is actually hosted on BitBucket: https://bitbucket.org/xi/pyyaml/ Also, a better starting point than PyYAML may be this existing fork of the library, ruamel.yaml: https://bitbucket.org/ruamel/yaml The fork makes several <http://yaml.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pyyaml.html> changes <http://yaml.readthedocs.io/en/latest/detail.html#round-trip-including-comments> which may be relevant to you. Nick
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
