On 24 Mar 2008, at 20:48, Rob Hudson wrote: > > On 3/24/08, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Ben Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Would proposing a complete replacement be a tad too controversial >>> for a GSoC >>> project? >> >> >> Yes. It also wouldn't succeed as a project, because it's the Google >> *Summer* of Code, not the Google Several Years of Code. > > And it sounds like 'empty' and 'brosner' are making good headway on > it... > http://blog.michaeltrier.com/2008/3/21/django-sqlalchemy >
Yes, but that is intended as purely a separate plugin, not as something part of Django. The code is there, it would just be a matter of figuring out the logistics (and politics!) of working it into the official distribution. Ben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
