>> * The "Contrib apps" component [1] should be made redundant and new >> components for each missing contrib app (e.g. contenttypes, sitemaps) >> should be added. I mean, even databrowse has its own component! :) The >> "Contrib app" mixes lots of unrelated things, making it a bit >> pointless. >> * For consistency, the "Authentication" component should be renamed to >> django.contrib.auth, and "RSS framework" to >> django.contrib.syndication.
I'm also +1 on those two. > However, "core" is clearly being misused (or at least misunderstood). > I'm open to suggestions (driven by the data) as to what extra > categories we should add and/or how we should rename core. There are > 169 open tickets attributed to "core" -- care to make some > suggestions? Core tends to end up as a dumping ground for people who haven't carefully read the (admittedly already long) list of categories. It's near the top, and so it's easy to choose over other more appropriate categories. Consolidating some of the redundant categories might help. I think the django-admin.py categories could be consolidated into a single one. In the interest of readability, we might rename django.contrib.foo to simply contrib.foo. As long as we're clarifying, "Django Web Site" might be better named "DjangoProject Web Site". Those later two probably aren't worth doing unless Trac provides an easy rename functionality. -Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
