On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Julien Phalip <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that 1.3 has been released (yay!), I'm reviving this thread to see
> if we can make Trac a little more efficient on our way to 1.4. I'll
> try to summarise what's been suggested so far in regard to improving
> and clarifying the "Component" field:
>
> * The "Contrib apps" component would be made redundant and new
> components for each missing contrib app (e.g. contenttypes, sitemaps)
> would be added. Also, for readability's sake, "django.contrib.foo"
> would be renamed to simply "contrib.foo".
>
> * For consistency, the "Authentication" component would be renamed to
> "contrib.auth", and "RSS framework" to "contrib.syndication".
>
> * Consolidate "django-admin.py", "django-admin.py inspectdb" and
> "django-admin.py runserver" into one component (called "Management
> commands" perhaps?).
>
> * Rename "Django Web site" to "Djangoproject.com Web site"
>
> * Lastly, potentially the most controversial change: for clarity's
> sake, rename "Core framework" to "Core (Other)", "Cache system" to
> "Core (Cache system)", "django.core.mail" to "Core (Mail)", and
> "Serialization" to "Core (Serialization)".
>
> Let me know if any of that is total yak shaving or if it's worth
> implementing. By the way, the reason why I care about this
> specifically is because I think that by making the component data more
> accurate and consistent, we'll drive in more useful contribution from
> people who feel they are expert or simply interested in specific areas
> of the codebase.

As with the other thread on Trac changes -- I agree this is worth
doing, but would like to hear some other core dev voices before making
any changes.

Yours,
Russ Magee %-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to