Ah, now I understand the confusion. I don't see him proposing a standards change. I see him saying "check out what I made." It's possible that this discussion leads in the direction you suggest, but it is very "cart before the horse" to try to force it there when that's not really what he was saying.
Do the same what: Test Google Groups and Yahoo Groups. Al On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7/3/2012 4:02 PM, Al Iverson wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Is there a simple description of the design for this proposal, other than >>> the code? Debating design is best done with design documents, not code. >>> The code is good for demonstrating feasibility, but not concepts. >> >> I'm not sure that's an appropriate response. It comes off as an >> insult, a complaint that he didn't share this exactly the way you >> wanted it shared. > > I don't think it is insulting to request that a proposal for changing or > enhancing an architecture be cast as a proposal or a spec, rather than only > offered as code. This is an ad hoc standards efforts and the methods of > making proposals in such environments is through a document that explores the > core issues, rather than requiring code review. > > >>> What DMARC constructs are changed and/or what mailing list behaviors are >>> changed? >> >> You should subscribe to the test list and see. It's pretty >> interesting, and it kinda fits with what I was thinking. > > I wasn't aware that the -test list was the place for proposing system > enhancements. Nor was it cited. > > >> I have been meaning to also set up a test Google Group and Yahoo Group >> to see how they handle headers and the concepts of authentication and >> who the sender is and how the sender is identified. My personal >> experience with both is a bit out of date. >> >> I strongly urge anybody else who has an opinion about what should or >> shouldn't be done by mailing lists in this modern age do the same. > > Sorry for my confusion, but "do the same" what? > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > > _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
